[UPDATE: I took a second to search for Nassim's other works and... WELL! He's pretty convinced (and he's trying to convince you) that NASA is covering up data of UFO's the size of the Earth caught on video entering the sun.
If you know me, you know that I obviously disagree.
According to him, these aliens are doing this in order to use the sun's singularity at it's core for space travel... It gets better too. Their smaller ships zip into our volcanoes to use the Earth's singularity for similar wormhole based travel.
Honestly, I think it's wildly entertaining; but sometimes it also makes me a bit sad. http://astronasty.blogspot.com/2012/03/nassim-haramein-of-schwarzschild-proton.html
Enjoy it for yourself, but only if you're all caught up with your PhysOrg RSS feed!]
Run this 5 minute video through your skeptical litmus test.
If all protons together equal the mass of the universe, what about the extra mass of neutrinos or other light particles that contain mass? It makes that number, so perfect, so aligned, at first elegant. He extrapolates by combining the observed mass and density of protons with vacuum energy. Again, this methodology, if a valid phenomenon, would have to be explained further. Does this effect apply to other particles? What are the implications there? Or is this a mathematical trick?
The unification of forces, sought after for a long time, and the incompatibility of standard mechanics of gravity on the quantum scale has been a holy grail of sorts for physicists to resolve. Now if we look at the nature of standard black holes, not protons, we can't forget that they exist as a singularity on a quantum level. All we know of black holes then should apply to these schwarzschild protons. This new theory debunks black hole evaporation. Stephen Hawking will be angered.
Strong force here is conveniently renamed as gravity. It's not necessarily a revelation, that aspect is only a revelation based on simple semantics. Try to explain how black holes are now, under your theory, positively charged, as protons are already confirmed to be.
So going along with this premise, he mentions that schwarzchild singularities (black holes) are separated by one proton's length. I didn't catch whether or not the math supported this, but the video didn't seem to provide any verbal explanation of this. It leads to the very pertinent question: why do these black holes, held together under the law of gravity now instead of gluons, not collide? If they did collide, we'd see the effects. We ought to have fusion as a natural process, an inevitable process with everything but hydrogen. Are traditional black holes, supermassive notably, schwartzchild protons? How do they differ?
A quick lookup based on the first few sentences in the video shows University of Leige as a legit University, with one Nobel Laureate.
I also notice that the video mentions the paper being peer reviewed by 11 scientists and that UoL accepted this paper for an award. Quite noticeably immediately for me at least... What journal has this been accepted/published by? If valid, this new model of quanta turns 90 years of quantum research running away with its tail between its legs. One university's acceptance is not sufficient for something this huge.
Furthermore, this theory, as I understand, is a math-heavy theoretical (hypothetical) model without the support of any experimentation. In science, your model needs to be supported with data, and must sufficiently predict resulting data to jive with your model. If the data don't fit, throw away your elegant theory, sir.
This is the website where you can find the paper. I endorse nothing. Here is the paper itself.
Nassim Haramein (2010). The Schwarzschild Proton
-----Sharing via these buttons will share the current article page, unless your current url is the main page of Astronasty. Click the title of the article to go to an individual article page.
Share Spread the Love